Invite Friends

Topic: US Politics

Trump plans massive 4th of July party in DC with presidential address: like?

  • Comments: 59 |
  • Votes: 17
  • Share
Picture?type=square
Discussion started by Tok Staff:
Trump has taken over planning the parade, show and fireworks and plans to speak from steps of Lincoln Memorial. Do you like the plan?
Background article: ... Read more
Results in this view: Y-patriotic/fun 9% - Convince Me 0% - Y-party/n-speech 9% - N-campaign Rally 82%
Anonymous-user
  • 27
Picture?type=square
  • 2
Anonymous-user
  • 1
Picture?type=square
  • 5
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 4
Picture?type=square
Picture?type=square
  • 6
Picture?type=square
Anonymous-user
by anon-ebda I just turn the channel when "IT" comes on !! I won't watch !! I'll watch repeats of something else !!! Unless he were to say, "I hereby resign", he has nothing to say that I want to hear !!
Picture?type=square
  • 1
Picture?type=square
  • 2
Anonymous-user
by anon-ebda Yes, Protesters have my blessings & support !!!
Picture?type=square
By Andrew Herzman You can give out blessings??? Do you give any to caner children?
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski Fake News is 93% lies proven by a Harvard unbiased study. Maybe your problem is you do not listen to America's best president since George. Or is it you have so little morals and decency like many Democrats that the truth and decency Trump stands for offends you.
Picture?type=square
By Andrew Herzman Harvard is biased towards the left.

You think genital grabbing Trump has any morals???
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski Clearly you never touched a woman's genitals but that is OK you will be 15 soon.
When you make the kind of money Trump did they climb all over you. In Russia I made less than I do now when I work but at $5500 a week they were all over me all the time. I know If I was ugly like you are Andrew then I would have had to be rich like Trump. Andrew save up and get hair implants. Real men have hair. My dad had a full head of hair into his 80's
Anonymous-user
by anon-a4e4 What's incredible about John is his total shamelessness. I don't know if he's real or an act (maybe he's been Squirty/Nixon all along, for those who remember him). He manages to be over the top in our absurd era, which is really an achievement.

John, care to provide a link to your "Harvard study"?
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski Lots of Web sites only not all available in EU so learn to use google and answer your own question if you know how to read Andrew do you know how to read?
Anonymous-user
by anon-ebda Trump & Morals ???? I don't think he has ANY brains !!!!
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski anon-ebda YOU DO NOT THINK should read " I cannot think as anon-ebda's IQ is less than 2/3 of Donald J. Trump"
His IQ is 156, yours is about average and that is always 100
People with such a low IQ should HUSH
Trump and I are extremely close in IQ points so listen and learn
Only very uneducated people refuse to listen to people smarter than they are I hope you are not that stupid. Live learn vote Trump and get smarter.
Anonymous-user
by anon-a4e4 John, there was a typo - I'm sure you meant 56 and not 156.
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski Anon-a4e4 Idiots like you cannot be helped.
If you learned to read you would realize that even FAKE NEWS knows Trumps IQ is 156
But IDIOTS who hate America hate Trump are stupid!
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman then why has he hidden his grades? you r hero is a big phoney he is nothing but an act anyone with any sense can see right through his act
Anonymous-user
by anon-a4e4 Again with the type. 56 - fifty six, try it in words. It keeps adding a one, which of course makes it really funny, but I'm sure you wouldn't want to say anything that ridiculous.

Did you know that Trump's good friend Kim has no annuus? It's true, the North Korean media said so and they would not lie to Trump!

I honestly don't know which is more believable your lie or theirs...
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski Tiny maybe because in University he majored like I did in Ring Dang Do.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu3gx5p1h5o
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski anon-a4e4 anyone with a 56 IQ is a Democrat. They are the stupidest humans on planet earth. 80 IQ is babbling IDIOT
not many even you are not at 56 my guess is your IQ is 90 or 95!
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman i am so much smarter than you
its like trying to debate an ant
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman liberal are actualy o average about 10 iq points smarter than conservatives on aaverage
we are rally smart
it why we have so much conmtempt for you
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski BS Tiny look at how stupid Maxine is. Ops look at what a Moron you are your IQ is in the 130's pretty much STUPID compared to Trump and my self. I had full boat scholarships you had boy friends (animals) who did not wash under their tails before you licked.
Picture?type=square
By John Lozinski You wording is incorrect.
Liberal IQ's are from 10 to 80
While 100 is average and most conservatives are much higher.
You TIny are unusual high for a Libturd you are in the 130's a mental midget compared to Trump or myself.
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman anecodtal
Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent

Satoshi Kanazawa

London School of Economics and Political Science
University College London

Birkbeck College University of London

Where do individual values and preferences come from? Why do people want what they want? And why do different people have different values and preferences?
Why Liberals and Atheists Are More Intelligent

Satoshi Kanazawa

London School of Economics and Political Science
University College London

Birkbeck College University of London

Where do individual values and preferences come from? Why do people want what they want? And why do different people have different values and preferences?
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman http://www.asanet.org/research-and-publications/journals/social-psychology-quarterly/why-liberals-and-atheists-are-more-intelligent
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/201003/why-liberals-are-more-intelligent-conservatives um wrong the average conservative iq is about 96 average liberal is about 108
Picture?type=square
By William Dykeman Anecdotal evidence is evidence from anecdotes: evidence collected in a casual or informal manner and relying heavily or entirely on personal testimony.

The term is sometimes used in a legal context to describe certain kinds of testimony which are uncorroborated by objective, independent evidence such as notarized documentation, photographs, audio-visual recordings, etc.

When used in advertising or promotion of a product, service, or idea, anecdotal reports are often called a testimonial, which are highly regulated[1] or banned in some[which?] jurisdictions.

When compared to other types of evidence, anecdotal evidence is generally regarded as limited in value due to a number of potential weaknesses, but may be considered within the scope of scientific method as some anecdotal evidence can be both empirical and verifiable, e.g. in the use of case studies in medicine. Other anecdotal evidence, however, does not qualify as scientific evidence, because its nature prevents it from being investigated by the scientific method. Where only one or a few anecdotes are presented, there is a larger chance that they may be unreliable due to cherry-picked or otherwise non-representative samples of typical cases.[2][3] Similarly, psychologists have found that due to cognitive bias people are more likely to remember notable or unusual examples rather than typical examples.[4] Thus, even when accurate, anecdotal evidence is not necessarily representative of a typical experience. Accurate determination of whether an anecdote is typical requires statistical evidence.[5] Misuse of anecdotal evidence is an informal fallacy and is sometimes referred to as the "person who" fallacy ("I know a person who..."; "I know of a case where..." etc.) which places undue weight on experiences of close peers which may not be typical.

In all forms of anecdotal evidence its reliability by objective independent assessment may be in doubt. This is a consequence of the informal way the information is gathered, documented, presented, or any combination of the three. The term is often used to describe evidence for which there is an absence of documentation, leaving verification dependent on the credibility of the party presenting the evidence.
Picture?type=square
By Andrew Herzman Not watching it doesn't mean it's not happening.